| 137010 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | 52200000 | Y | PLAN_ACT | Housing Action Plan: As-of-Right Zoning for Mid-rise Buildings on Avenues and Updated Rear Transition Performance Standards - Final Report | 2024.PH16.1 | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>The recommended As-of-right Zoning for Mid-rise Buildings on Avenues is one of 54 Housing Action Plan initiatives to make changes to the City’s Official Plan, Zoning By-law and Urban Design Guidelines to enable more housing in neighbourhoods, along major streets and avenues. Other related action items include: the Expanding Housing Options in Neighbourhoods (EHON) Major Streets Study, As-of-Right Zoning for Avenue Studies with no Implementing Zoning, the Avenues Policy Review, Expanding Mixed Use Areas, and Implementing Zoning for new Mixed Use Areas. City Planning has either reported out on the actions such as the Major Streets Study or is working to advance these action items in a comprehensive and integrated manner.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report recommends a zoning by-law amendment to permit as-of-right heights and densities for mid-rise buildings on lands identified as Avenues and designated Mixed Use Areas in the Official Plan. The recommended zoning by-law amendment implements urban design performance standards, including updated standards for rear transition alongside the increases to height and density permissions. These changes will enable and expand mid-rise development on the Avenues without the need for a site-specific zoning approval. Property owners would continue to be able to seek additional height or density through a minor variance where appropriate. The recommended changes have the potential to unlock an increase of almost 61,000 dwelling units above the approximately 21,500 dwelling units achievable under existing zoning standards.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The recommended zoning by-law amendment would remove barriers, ease administration, and support the creation of more housing as part of the Housing Action Plan to achieve or exceed the provincial housing target of 285,000 new homes over the next 10 years.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>City Planning has also been conducting a comprehensive review of the Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards Urban Design Guidelines and has completed initial updates to the performance standards for Rear Transitions between mid-rise buildings and other buildings or open space uses. The final updated Rear Transition Performance Standards 5A and 5B will be formally incorporated in the consolidated Mid-rise Building Urban Design Guidelines document and presented to Planning and Housing Committee in Q4 2024.</p> | 16 | 1 | CMMTTEE | PH | All | N | 1731474000000 | … | Report | ACTION | Amended | Main | Planning Act, RSO 1990 | Public Notice Given | Committee | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | ACTION | true | Amended | 9:30 AM | … | … | … | … | — |
| 137268 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | NO_ACTN | — | N | — | Housing Action Plan: As-of-Right Zoning for Mid-rise Buildings on Avenues and Updated Rear Transition Performance Standards - Supplementary Report | 2024.PH16.1a | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>The City is advancing several initiatives under the Housing Action Plan (HAP) and the Expanding Housing Options in Neighbourhoods (EHON) initiative to make changes to the City’s Official Plan, Zoning By-law and Urban Design Guidelines to enable more housing in neighbourhoods. The HAP includes a number of action items that address mid-rise development and Mixed Use Areas along major streets, Avenues, in transition zones and in major growth areas. These initiatives build on each other to facilitate growth at all scales, unlocking more housing types along the Major Streets and Avenues, while identifying more opportunities throughout the city for taller buildings, and providing choice for residents. The work program focuses on updating the City’s policies and zoning permissions to expand the Avenues and Mixed Use Areas, update built form and public realm standards, and implement as-of-right zoning permissions to make it easier, faster, and cheaper to build mid-rise buildings.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In 2010, the Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Study and Performance Standards resulted in a set of generalized urban design guidelines to help catalyze the re-urbanization of the Avenues while providing transition to adjacent areas. From 2010 to 2023, over 136 mid-rise buildings were completed. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>This supplementary report provides an overview of the HAP’s Avenues, Mid-rise and Mixed-Use Areas projects, how they cumulatively remove barriers, ease administration, and support the goal to achieve or exceed the provincial housing target of 285,000 new homes over the next 10 years, to continue to achieve intensification and housing opportunities along Toronto’s Avenues. Together, the outcomes of the work program may include expansion of the lands that benefit from the Avenues policy framework; an increase in the planned intensification along Avenues; and as-of-right zoning permissions for intensification that will reduce the need for mid-rise development to obtain site-specific zoning permissions. Key opportunities to enable additional residential intensification through the work program are:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>- On-going review of mid-rise design guidelines to consider taller and denser built-form along Avenues;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>- The Official Plan review of Avenue policies, followed by implementing zoning; and</p>
<p>Re-examining older Avenue Studies.</p> |
| 137078 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 52200000 | Y | PLAN_ACT | Low-Rise Residential Lands in the Toronto and East York District of the City of Toronto, to Zoning By-law 569-2013 | 2024.PH16.2 | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report outlines the analysis, consultation process, and recommended zoning amendments to advance the first phase of work to incorporate low-rise residential lands in Toronto and East York District into Zoning By-law 569-2013 (the "City-wide Zoning By-law). Staff recommend bringing low-rise residential lands into the City-wide Zoning By-law with zoning standards that are consistent with the applicable former municipal zoning by-law, consistent with recent city-wide zoning amendments, and in conformity with the Official Plan. These properties had active zoning by-law amendment or site plan control applications in 2012 and were excluded from the City-wide Zoning By-law through the transition protocol.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This study is part of the on-going work to simplify and modernize the City-wide Zoning By-law, and to support consistent application of the City-wide Zoning By-law. Bringing these lands into the City-wide Zoning By-law will remove barriers, ease administration, and enable the creation of more housing as part of the Housing Action Plan. In addition, the recommended zoning by-law amendment will enable properties to take advantage of the removal of parking minimums and permissions for a broad range of "missing middle" housing permissions in support of the Housing Action Plan and its target of 285,000 homes over the next ten years.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>City staff have completed the first phase of the study's work plan for the Toronto and East York district, by reviewing approximately 327 properties subject to former municipal zoning by-laws and assessing the appropriateness of each property for inclusion in the City-wide Zoning By-law. This report recommends approval of the attached zoning amendments to incorporate approximately 190 low-rise residential properties into the City-wide Zoning By-law.</p> |
| 137220 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 52200000 | Y | PLAN_ACT | Expanding Housing Options in Neighbourhoods - Beaches-East York Pilot Project - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments - Decision Report - Approval | 2024.PH16.3 | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>The Beaches-East York Pilot Project (“the Pilot Project”) is part of the Expanding Housing Options in Neighbourhoods ("EHON") initiative. The Pilot Project was initiated with the purpose of building a missing middle demonstration project in consultation with the community and the development industry on City-owned land within the Beaches-East York neighbourhood (Ward 19).</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report recommends amending the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a development on a City-owned site located at 72 Amroth Avenue. The proposal includes a six-storey apartment building fronting Amroth Avenue with a height of 19.5 metres (23.5 metres with the mechanical penthouse), and a three-storey fourplex with a height of 9.95 metres and a three-storey duplex with a height of 9.65 metres at the rear of the lot. The development has a total of 34 residential units, 39 bicycle parking spaces and 2,353 square metres of gross floor area.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposal is an appropriate example of intensification within designated Neighbourhoods. It is in a form that is respectful of the adjacent low-rise detached houses, while making use of an underutilized site near a major transit station and adjacent Danforth Avenue. The Danforth Study from Coxwell Avenue to Victoria Park Avenue further recommends a mid-rise built form of up to eleven-storeys on this segment of Danforth Avenue. It advances a design which includes the provision of six accessible units, exceeding the Toronto Accessibility Design Guidelines requirement for 15 percent of the total number of units be accessible and adaptable, and a unit mix which meets the City of Toronto Growing Up Guidelines regarding the provision of two and three-bedroom units. As a City-initiated project, it will meet at least Version 4, Tier 2 of the Toronto Green Standard. The proposal preserves the five existing mature trees on site.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The processes and approaches developed through this initiative are intended to inform how missing middle projects may be built on other sites, both publicly and privately owned. In support of this goal, City staff have also developed a set of Key Findings to inform the creation of future policy and process changes for expanding housing options in neighbourhoods, including work on transition zones through the Housing Action Plan and work on enabling permissions for low-rise multi-unit residential buildings through the Housing Accelerator Fund. The Key Findings are included as Attachment 16 of this report.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>City staff recommend approval of the City-initiated Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments and associated recommendations.</p> |
| 137193 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | — | N | — | Implementing a Rental Renovation Licence By-law to Address Renovictions | 2024.PH16.4 | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report responds to the June 26, 2024, City Council directive to staff to develop a “Hamilton-style” renovictions bylaw (Renovictions Bylaw) and implementation framework to protect tenants and prevent "renovictions". A renoviction is when a landlord illegitimately evicts a tenant by alleging that vacant possession of a rental unit is needed to undertake renovations or repairs. Renovictions can include refusing to allow a tenant who has exercised their right of first refusal to return post-renovation, illegally raising the rent on a returning tenant, or not undertaking major renovations after evicting renters. This results in the displacement of tenants, the permanent loss of affordable market rental housing, and contributes to rising homelessness in Toronto.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As rent policies and landlord-tenant matters fall under provincial jurisdiction, the City of Toronto has urged the Province to take action against renovictions, including enforcing the Helping Homebuyers, Protecting Tenants Act, 2023 (Bill 97), improving Landlord and Tenant Board processes, introducing vacancy rent control, requiring temporary relocation assistance during renovations, and creating a centralized data system for rental properties and evictions. In the absence of these provincial changes, Toronto has developed local solutions. In 2022, City Council adopted a Renovictions Policy to guide the development of a bylaw to curb evictions done under the pretext of a renovation, protect tenants, and preserve affordable rental housing.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The City of Hamilton was the first Ontario municipality to pass a bylaw requiring landlords to obtain a licence before undertaking renovations that necessitate tenant eviction. In June 2024, the Planning and Housing Committee reviewed a staff report analyzing Hamilton’s bylaw and directed staff to undertake consultations with affected stakeholders and recommended a similar approach for Toronto. Over August and September, the City undertook a multi-channel consultation program consisting of focus groups with housing advocates, tenants rights experts, landlord and tenants associations, six city-wide in-person consultations and one virtual consultation, and a public survey. The results of this feedback, and analysis by City staff, have informed the Renovictions Bylaw proposed in this report that will require landlords to:</p>
<p> </p>
<ul>
<li>Apply for a Rental Renovation Licence within seven days of issuing an N13 notice to end tenancy</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<ul>
<li>Obtain a building permit before applying for the Rental Renovation Licence</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<ul>
<li>Obtain and submit a report from a qualified person identifying that the renovation or maintenance work is so extensive that the tenant must leave the unit, and pay a Rental Renovation Licence fee of $700.00 per unit</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<ul>
<li>Post a Tenant Information Notice at the subject unit to inform the tenant of the licence application and to enable the tenant to seek information about their rights</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<ul>
<li>Complete a plan to provide tenant(s) who choose to return to their units with temporary, comparable housing at similar rents, or provide monthly rent-gap payments (based on post-2015 average market rents) to cover the rent difference, with tenants finding their own temporary housing</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<ul>
<li>Provide moving allowances to all tenants</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<ul>
<li>Provide tenants with severance compensation where the tenant is choosing not to return to the unit after the renovation or repair work is complete</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<ul>
<li>Post the issued Rental Renovation Licence on the door of the unit</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<p>This report recommends the Renovictions Bylaw take effect on July 31, 2025, allowing staff sufficient time to undertake appropriate education and communication efforts. The Toronto Building Division will implement and enforce the bylaw. Toronto Building staff are well positioned to inform landlords of their obligations under the bylaw early in the building permit process and will develop clear, understandable and multi-lingual public-facing guidelines to support compliance. Staff heard clearly during public engagement of the importance of proactively updating tenants on the status of renovation licence and building permit-related work. Toronto Building will be actively monitoring building permits on units where renovation licences have been issued to support the timely completion of work and facilitate the ability of tenants to return to their rental unit as quickly as possible.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed framework is intended to balance the need to address the misuse of renovations as an excuse to evict tenants, with the need for renovations and repair work that are necessary in Toronto with its often aging, existing rental housing stock. Adopting Toronto’s Renovictions Bylaw will significantly improve health, social, and economic outcomes for tenants and support the HousingTO Plan.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This staff report has been written in consultation with the Housing Secretariat, Municipal Licensing and Standards, Legal Services and Strategic Public and Employee Communications.</p> |
| 137200 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | — | Development Review Timeline Metrics - Fourth Quarter 2024 | 2024.PH16.5 | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report responds to Planning and Housing Committee's direction for staff to report on development review timeline metrics to the Planning and Housing Committee on a quarterly basis (<a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2023.PH6.2">2023.PH6.2</a>). Quarterly reports include the following:</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">a. Average timeline to complete the Pre-Application Consultation Process; </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">b. Average timeline to reach a decision on a Zoning By-law Application;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">c. Average timeline to reach a decision on a combined Official Plan Amendment/Zoning By-law Application; and</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">d. Average timeline to approve a Site Plan Application. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>In addition to a description of the metrics listed above, the report provides context on how ongoing improvements to the development review process impact application review timelines in the medium to long term.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>To date, staff have advanced three quarterly reports: Q1 2024 (<a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2024.PH9.2">2024.PH9.2</a>), Q2 2024 (<a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2024.PH11.5">2024.PH11.5</a>), and Q3 2024 (<a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2024.PH14.4">2024.PH14.4</a>). Reporting has evolved to reflect ongoing legislative change and to improve data accuracy and interpretation, as detailed in the Comments section of this report.</p> | 16 | 5 |
| 137204 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | — | Authority to Enter into Municipal Housing Facility Agreements under the Community Housing Partnership Renewal Program | 2024.PH16.6 | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>In December 2019, City Council approved the Community Housing Partnership Renewal Program (“CHPR”), a new program designed to incentivize former federal non-profit housing providers with expired operating agreements to enter into new agreements with the City. Through the program, community housing providers commit to maintaining their rental housing as affordable, and potentially deepening the level of affordability provided to households, in exchange for a property tax exemption and housing benefits for their residents. The program provides a viable and cost-effective approach to preserve the supply of affordable rental housing in Toronto, representing a fraction of what the City would need to invest to replace them with newly constructed or acquired affordable homes. The Community Housing Partnership Renewal Program has secured approximately 700 affordable rental homes with 6 non-profit housing providers since its inception.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The implementation of CHPR requires site-specific authority from Council to approve individual municipal housing facility agreements for participating community housing providers. The purpose of this report is to obtain Council authority for the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to enrol Church of Atonement Senior Citizens (“Church of Atonement”), a non-profit housing provider with a total of 76 affordable rental homes, for a 20-year term, into the program. In addition to securing affordable rental homes, agreements under CHPR will deepen affordability for residents through the provision of housing benefits.</p> | 16 |
| 137219 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | — | Tenancy Update: Beech Hall Housing Co-operative and Alexandra Park Housing Co-operative | 2024.PH16.7 | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>On June 26, 2024, through PH13.9 - Community Housing Sector Modernization and Growth Strategy, City Council approved a new Policy Framework for Ground Leases with Community Housing Providers (“Policy Framework”). This Policy Framework provides a guide for the City when making decisions to renew, amend, or enter into new ground lease agreements with Community Housing Providers which operate a vital part of Toronto's affordable housing stock.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Staff were directed to report back by October 30, 2024 to Planning and Housing Committee on the status of lease negotiations with the Beech Hall Housing Co-operative (“Beech Hall”) and Alexandra Park Housing Co-operative (“Alexandra Park”) and, should it be necessary, make recommendations to extend the current lease arrangements until such time as new leases are finalized.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Beech Hall is a collection of 16 two-storey walk-up apartment buildings providing 128-units to low-income seniors (aged 55 or over) at 2 Humber Boulevard (Ward 5 – York South-Weston) in the community of Mount Dennis. In 1980, Beech Hall entered into a 45-year ground lease agreement with the former Borough of York, which is set to expire on January 3, 2025. The recommendations in this report would result in Beech Hall continuing to occupy its premises while negotiations for a new lease agreement and a new operating agreement are concluded.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Alexandra Park is composed of 104-units in four low-rise apartment buildings and 39 townhouses providing housing for low-income individuals and families at 25 Eden Place (10 – Spadina-Fort York). On April 1, 1972, Alexandra Park entered into an agreement with the City to build in the Alexandra Park redevelopment area. On February 1, 1974, the building was substantially completed and the City and the Alexandra Park entered into a 50-year lease agreement, which expired on January 31, 2024. Alexandra Park continues to occupy its premises while negotiations for a new lease agreement and a new operating agreement are concluded. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report provides an update on the current status and next steps of lease negotiations with Beech Hall and Alexandra Park, and requests Council’s authority to extend current leases by up to one year.</p> |
| 137206 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | — | McCleary District Precinct Plan Study Update | 2024.PH16.8 | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report provides an overview of the progress to date on the McCleary District Precinct Plan. The study is being undertaken by a project team led by CreateTO, working closely with the City of Toronto and Waterfront Toronto. Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments will accompany the Precinct Plan in a final report, targeted for early 2025.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The McCleary Precinct is bounded by the Don Roadway to the west, Commissioners Street to the south, Lake Shore Boulevard East to the north and Logan Avenue to the east. Of the developable land in the Precinct, approximately two-thirds is City of Toronto and CreateTO lands.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The McCleary District Precinct is envisioned to grow into a dense, urban mixed-use, mixed-income, complete community in the Port Lands. It also plays a unique role as a transitional area between the emerging mixed-use areas (the new island, formerly Villiers Island, and East Harbour) the Productions, Interactive and Creative ("PIC") employment-focussed districts (Turning Basin and Media City), as well as the port and industrial areas that continue to be instrumental to meeting city building objectives in the area (South Port and East Port).</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The purpose of the study is to implement the policy direction in the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan, providing detailed design and implementation guidance for development in the Precinct. The study is sufficiently advanced to inform ongoing discussions about private lands in the Precinct with under-appeal development applications, in the context of Ontario Land Tribunal appeals with key information and exchange dates occurring through Q4 of 2024.</p> | 16 |
| 137205 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | INFORM | RECEIVED | — | N | — | Updates on Implementation of Bill 23 Amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act | 2024.PH16.9 | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report provides updates on the City of Toronto’s phased implementation respecting changes to the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA) enacted as part of Bill 23, the More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 ("Bill 23") and Bill 200, the Homeowner Protection Act, 2024 ("Bill 200"). The Bill 23 amendments came into effect on January 1, 2023, while the Bill 200 amendments came into effect on June 6, 2024.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Staff are implementing a phased approach to the Ontario Heritage Act amendments. Phase one included making changes to existing policy and procedures to enable the City to identify and conserve heritage properties undergoing redevelopment within the new Ontario Heritage Act legislative context. Phase one concluded in 2023. Phase two focuses on addressing amendments made to Section 27 of the Ontario Heritage Act that impact Council authorized properties included on the City's Heritage Register (the "Register") that are not yet designated under the Ontario Heritage Act ("Listed Properties").</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Bill 23 amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act that relate to Listed Properties include provisions to deem that properties will be removed from the Register two years after their listing date, if no further action is taken by Council to designate the properties under either Parts IV or V of the Ontario Heritage Act. The original removal deadline of January 1, 2025, was extended an additional two years through Bill 200 for properties on the Register on or before January 1, 2023 ("Legacy Listed Properties"). Properties listed since January 2023 must still be removed on the original timeline. Once removed, Council may not relist any property for a period of five years.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Register contains approximately 3,700 Listed Properties. Within phase two of the City's response to Bills 23 and 200, staff are developing a proactive strategy to designate selected properties based on an applied priority criteria and will implement ways to monitor properties that are believed to hold cultural heritage value or interest following their removal from the Register. Also under consideration is the creation of a publicly accessible record of formerly listed properties to inform owners about the potential cultural heritage value of their properties, and to serve the public interest of the broader community.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>To provide a greater level of protection for some Listed Properties, following research and evaluation a subset of properties meeting provincial criteria will be recommended for designation under Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. These designations will commence in the fourth quarter of of 2024 and will be subject to future reporting to Council.</p> |
| 136633 | LETTER | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | NO_ACTN | — | N | — | Update on the City’s Implementation of Bill 23 | 2024.PH16.9a | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At its meeting on March 8 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item <a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2024.PB16.15">PB16.15</a> and made recommendations to City Council.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Summary from the Staff Presentation from the Acting Project Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Acting Project Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning will give a presentation to the Toronto Preservation Board updating the Board on the City’s Implementation of Bill 23.</p> | 16 | 9 | CMMTTEE | PH | All | N | — | … | Letter | ACTION | No Action | Main | — | — | Committee | … |
| 137179 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | — | 28 Halton Street - Notice of Intention to Designate a Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act | 2024.PH16.10 | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the property at 28 Halton Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its cultural heritage value according to the Statement of Significance which includes a description of Heritage Attributes found in Attachment 1.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The subject property at 28 Halton Street is located on the north side of Halton Street at its junction with Givins Street, southeast of Ossington Avenue and Dundas Street in the Trinity-Bellwoods neighbourhood. A location map and current photograph of the heritage property is found in Attachment 2.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Constructed in c.1892, the property at 28 Halton Street contains a prominent, three-storey house-form building designed by Toronto architect Francis R. Heakes, Chief Architect of Ontario from 1896 to 1930. With its grand architectural massing and skillful combination of Richardsonian Romanesque and Queen Anne stylist elements, the property was constructed for William Levack, an international cattle dealer and an instrumental investor in the Union Stockyard Company (later known as the Ontario Stockyards). Levack's house replaced the nearly 100-year-old 'Pine Grove', the homestead of Colonel James Givins (1759-1846). Since 1963, the property at 28 Halton Street has been adaptively reused as the Maynard Nursing Home, a privately-owned long-term care home, located in a residential neighbourhood in Trinity-Bellwood's 'Little Portugal'. As it is the terminal point of the vista looking north on Givins Street, the property is also an important neighborhood landmark.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Staff have determined that the property at 28 Halton Street has cultural heritage value and meets 5 of the Ontario Regulation 9/06 criteria prescribed for municipal designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. A property may be designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, if it meets two or more of the nine criteria.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property was listed on the City's Heritage Register on February 26, 1981.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On July 25, 2024, an application was made to the Committee of Adjustment to construct a rear four-storey addition to the north of the subject property, with three-storey wing additions to the east and west. The 1892 structure is proposed to be retained in situ.</p> |
| 137262 | LETTER | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | NO_ACTN | — | N | — | 28 Halton Street - Notice of Intention to Designate a Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act | 2024.PH16.10a | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At its meeting on October 17, 2024 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB23.1 and made recommendations to City Council.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Summary from the report (October 1, 2024) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the property at 28 Halton Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its cultural heritage value according to the Statement of Significance which includes a description of Heritage Attributes found in Attachment 1.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The subject property at 28 Halton Street is located on the north side of Halton Street at its junction with Givins Street, southeast of Ossington Avenue and Dundas Street in the Trinity-Bellwoods neighbourhood. A location map and current photograph of the heritage property is found in Attachment 2.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Constructed in c.1892, the property at 28 Halton Street contains a prominent, three-storey house-form building designed by Toronto architect Francis R. Heakes, Chief Architect of Ontario from 1896 to 1930. With its grand architectural massing and skillful combination of Richardsonian Romanesque and Queen Anne stylist elements, the property was constructed for William Levack, an international cattle dealer and an instrumental investor in the Union Stockyard Company (later known as the Ontario Stockyards). The baronial estate replaced the nearly 100-year-old 'Pine Grove', the homestead of Colonel James Givins (1759-1846). Since 1963, the property at 28 Halton Street has been adaptively reused as the Maynard Nursing Home, a privately-owned long-term care home, ensconced in a residential neighbourhood in Trinity-Bellwood's 'Little Portugal'. As it is the terminal point of the vista looking north on Givins Street, the property is also an important neighborhood landmark.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Staff have determined that the property at 28 Halton Street has cultural heritage value and meets 5 of the Ontario Regulation 9/06 criteria prescribed for municipal designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. A property may be designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, if it meets two or more of the nine criteria.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property was listed on the City's Heritage Register on February 26, 1981.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On July 25, 2024, an application was made to the Committee of Adjustment to construct a rear four-storey addition to the north of the subject property, with three-storey wing additions to the east and west. The 1892 structure is proposed to be retained in situ.</p> |
| 137199 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | — | 630 Spadina Avenue - Notice of Intention to Designate a Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act | 2024.PH16.11 | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the property at 630 Spadina Avenue under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its cultural heritage value according to the Statement of Significance which includes a description of Heritage Attributes found in Attachment 1.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property at 630 Spadina Avenue (Knox Presbyterian Church) is located on the west side of Spadina Avenue, approximately 30 metres south of Harbord Street, at the eastern boundary of the Harbord Village neighbourhood. The property contains a 1909 neo-Gothic style church with a 1907 Sunday school wing at the rear, a 1961 modernist-style church hall (Fellowship Centre), and 1961 modernist-style chapel. A location map and current photograph of the heritage property is found in Attachment 2.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property has been an active place of worship since 1907 with each of the three structures having been designed and built for Knox Presbyterian Church. The church and Sunday school, designed by Toronto architect James Wilson Gray, features a neo-Gothic exterior and interior while the church contains stained glass windows crafted by the firms of N.T. Lyon Company and Robert McCausland. The chapel, built 52 years later with the Fellowship Centre, was designed by the significant architectural firm of John B. Parkin Associates, and features a unique design with atypical square plan, low slung brick clad walls and curved roof.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property was listed on the City's Heritage Register on April 27, 2006.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A property may be designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, if it meets two or more of the nine criteria.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Staff have determined that the property at 630 Spadina Avenue has cultural heritage value and meets five of the Ontario Regulation 9/06 criteria prescribed for municipal designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In accordance with 3.1.6.50 of the Official Plan and the City's Protocol for the Identification and Review of Heritage Places of Worship, Heritage Planning staff met with Knox Church to seek their opinion on the heritage attributes of the property which are the liturgical elements to be identified in the designating by-law. Knox Church considers all interior spaces of the church, Sunday school and chapel to be liturgical elements.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On May 18, 2018, an Official Plan Amendment application (18 161814 STE 20 OZ) was submitted to the City to redesignate the property from Neighbourhoods to Mixed-use to permit a 14-storey residential building. A Notice of Complete Application was issued on May 21, 2018. A zoning bylaw amendment application has yet to be submitted.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Prescribed Event occurred on this property before January 1, 2023, therefore, Section 29(1.2) 2 of the Ontario Heritage Act does not apply to require Council to issue a notice of intention to designate within 90 days of a prescribed event.</p> |
| 137246 | LETTER | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | NO_ACTN | — | N | — | 630 Spadina Avenue - Notice of Intention to Designate a Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act | 2024.PH16.11a | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At its meeting on October 17, 2024 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB23.2 and made recommendations to City Council.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Summary from the report (October 1, 202) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the property at 630 Spadina Avenue under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its cultural heritage value according to the Statement of Significance which includes a description of Heritage Attributes found in Attachment 1.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property at 630 Spadina Avenue (Knox Presbyterian Church) is located on the west side of Spadina Avenue, approximately 30 metres south of Harbord Street, at the eastern boundary of the Harbord Village neighbourhood. The property contains a 1909 neo-Gothic style church with a 1907 Sunday school wing at the rear, a 1961 modernist-style church hall (Fellowship Centre), and 1961 modernist-style chapel. A location map and current photograph of the heritage property is found in Attachment 2.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property has been an active place of worship since 1907 with each of the three structures having been designed and built for Knox Presbyterian Church. The church and Sunday school, designed by Toronto architect James Wilson Gray, features a neo-Gothic exterior and interior while the church contains stained glass windows crafted by the firms of N.T. Lyon Company and Robert McCausland. The chapel, built 52 years later with the Fellowship Centre, was designed by the significant architectural firm of John B. Parkin Associates, and features a unique design with atypical square plan, low slung brick clad walls and curved roof.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property was listed on the City's Heritage Register on April 27, 2006.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A property may be designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, if it meets two or more of the nine criteria.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Staff have determined that the property at 630 Spadina Avenue has cultural heritage value and meets five of the Ontario Regulation 9/06 criteria prescribed for municipal designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In accordance with 3.1.6.50 of the Official Plan and the City's Protocol for the Identification and Review of Heritage Places of Worship, Heritage Planning Staff met with Knox Church to seek their opinion on the heritage attributes of the property which are the liturgical elements to be identified in the designating by-law. Knox Church considers all interior spaces of the church, Sunday school and chapel to be liturgical elements.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On May 18, 2018, an Official Plan Amendment application (18 161814 STE 20 OZ) was submitted to the City to redesignate Neighbourhoods to Mixed-use to permit a 14-storey residential building. A Notice of Complete Application was issued on May 21, 2018.</p>
<p>A zoning bylaw amendment application has yet to be submitted.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Prescribed Event occurred on this property before January 1, 2023, therefore, Section 29(1.2) 2 of the Ontario Heritage Act does not apply to require Council to issue a notice of intention to designate within 90 days of a prescribed event.</p> |
| 137368 | REPORT | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | — | City Comments on Proposed amendment to Ontario Regulation 299/19 ADDITIONAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS, made under the Planning Act | 2024.PH16.12 | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>On September 23, 2024, the Province introduced a proposed amendment to Ontario Regulation 299/19 Additional Residential Units (ARUs), made under the Planning Act on the Environmental Registry of Ontario (ERO) (<a href="https://ero.ontario.ca/notice/019-9210">https://ero.ontario.ca/notice/019-9210</a>). The Province provided stakeholders 30 days to review and provide comments on the proposed regulation, with comments due by October 23, 2024. The Chief Planner has submitted a letter with staff comments on the proposed regulation to the Environmental Registry of Ontario by the commenting deadline. In May 2024, City Council adopted comments in response to the Minister’s Regulation Making Authority proposed in ERO 019-8369 (Bill 185, Cutting Red Tape to Build More Homes Act, 2024), to establish requirements and standards for Additional Residential Units. The City commented that regulations related to individual units rest with Municipalities, with the direction to make changes in contextually appropriate manners. This continues to be the City of Toronto’s comment, and as it relates to ERO 019-9210, proposed amendment to Ontario Regulation 299/19 Additional Residential Units, made under the <em>Planning Act</em>.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed changes to Ontario Regulation 299/19 Additional Residential Units, recommends overriding five performance standards in municipal zoning by-laws with the intention of increasing the uptake Additional Residential Units. Additional Residential Units include secondary suites, laneway and garden suites, and multiplexes. The proposed changes include the removal of required angular planes, increased maximum lot coverage, removal of floor space index (FSI), removal of required minimum lot size, and reduction in minimum building separation distances between the main residential building and an ancillary building containing an Additional Residential Unit.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Since 2018, Council has adopted zoning regulations for Additional Residential Units to effectively introduce laneway and garden suites, secondary suites, and multi-plexes while balancing impacts on privacy, access to sunlight, stormwater run off, soft landscaping, tree canopy and biodiversity. This report provides a high-level summary and discussion of the proposed amendment to Ontario Regulation 299/19 changes and potential impacts on the City’s of Toronto’s implementation of Additional Residential Units.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In May 2024, City Council adopted comments in response to Minister’s Regulation Making Authority ERO 019-8369 (Bill 185, Cutting Red Tape to Build More Homes Act, 2024), which granted the Minister the authority to make regulations establishing requirements and standards for Additional Residential Units. The City commented that regulations related to individual units rest with Municipalities, with the direction to make changes in contextually appropriate manners.</p> |
| 137335 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | — | Building More Missing Middle - Addressing Gaps in Multiplex Permissions | 2024.PH16.13 | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>On May 10, 2023, City Council adopted Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments to permit multiplexes city-wide. In recent years, Toronto City Council has made significant strides toward eliminating exclusionary zoning and promoting gentle density in Neighbourhoods across the city, including by legalizing multiplexes, garden suites, laneway suites, and permitting small-scale apartments on Major Streets.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A primary objective of the award-winning Expanding Housing Options in Neighbourhoods (EHON) program is to legalize diverse housing types as-of-right. The minor variance process often leads to delays and increased costs, hindering the construction of new housing units. It is essential to address gaps in the zoning by-law to ensure consistent interpretations, rather than relying on the discretion of individual planners or the Committee of Adjustment.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Stakeholders have raised concerns that the current interpretation of the Zoning By-law 569-2013 amendment to permit multiplexes is creating obstacles to building multiplex housing. Recently, applications for semi-detached fourplexes have been classified as one single apartment building instead of two multiplexes. This classification impacts building code requirements, financing options, and incentives – creating a barrier to building more missing middle housing.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>One of the most powerful policy tools we have to enable more missing middle housing is development charge (DC) exemptions. Multiplexes with four or fewer units on a single property have development charges waived on the second, third, and fourth units. This waiver is vital: on a smaller missing middle project, the tens of thousands of dollars in development charges can make the difference between a project being financially feasible or cost prohibitive.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>However, if an applicant intends to build a five-unit multiplex – the threshold at which they can access low-cost Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation financing – they have to pay development charges on all five units, making such projects less financially feasible.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A gap in the policy also exists where a builder or developer is building a four-plex in addition to a garden suite and/or a laneway suite. While Council has approved the development charge exemption for up to four units and a separate deferral program for development charges on laneway and garden suites, attempting to build both at once can trigger development charges on all units in the multiplex. This runs counter to the policy objective of maximizing the number of housing units in missing middle projects and must be addressed.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Multiplex Study Final Report recommended establishing a monitoring program to track the uptake of new builds and to identify challenges in achieving multiplex housing. In line with that planned report, this motion requests that City Planning staff provide clarity on the correct interpretation of the zoning by-law. This motion is also requesting that the City Solicitor and Finance and Treasury Services consider revising the development charge bylaw to help enable more missing middle projects to move forward.</p> |